The Impacts of Foldable Containers, Street-Turn and Depot
In this study, we formulated a novel Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model considering a multi-period and multi-region shipping network to minimize the total cost for empty
particularly because empty transport can never be completely eliminated (see se ction 2). The potential cost savings of foldable containers however extend beyond low transport costs. containers also provides cost savings. Nevertheless there are obviously hacks and eyes on
However, due to trade imbalances transport movements of empty containers remain to some extent unavoidable. Therefore, foldable containers seem an attractive option from the point of view of saving transport costs as well as handling and storage costs. So far, however, these containers have not been introduced successfully.
Empty container transport involves high costs, particularly for shipping lines, since they generally bear these container management costs. Not surprisingly, shipping lines try to reduce the costs of moving empty containers as much as they can. Most strategies are focussed on improving the instruments to match cargo with empty containers.
Shintani, Konings, and Imai (2012) introduced a fleet management model for liner shipping networks by considering both foldable and standard containers, which motivated our study, and the mathematical model used revealed the optimal mix of using both types of containers in the fleet.
In this study, we formulated a novel Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model considering a multi-period and multi-region shipping network to minimize the total cost for empty
For this purpose a cost–benefit analysis is adopted in which four logistic concepts to use foldable containers are presented as a framework for analysis. The costs and benefits of using
the costs of container fleet management in liner shipping (Shintaniet al, 2012). Given that even with the perfect information systems to management & minimize the transportation movements
In this regard, a decision-maker should make a great effort to find a suboptimal mix of foldable and standard containers by a cost-efficient and reliable design of a container network with
However, the optimal number of foldable containers differs in each situation, and the cost of fold-able containers is high. To address this, we propose implementing effective container usage
Freight costs constitute on average 8% of the total costs of importing (when cost of goods are included) for the selected products. Of these, sea freight costs charged by shipping
Therefore, foldable containers seem an attractive option from the point of view of saving transport costs as well as handling and storage costs.
Konings [7] analyzed the economic and logistical viability of introducing foldable containers through a cost-benefit analysis, showing that the use of foldable containers could lead to substantial
To illustrate the impact of foldable containers on back haul shippers, a numerical analysis is performed on the same shipping network in the US Mid-West which was analyzed in Goh and
This paper puts in focus the potential of foldable/collapsible containers towards improving logistics management as an alternative to the current standard containers. With Port Louis,
PDF version includes complete article with source references. Suitable for printing and offline reading.